“Now, what I want is facts. Teach these boys and girls
nothing but facts. Facts alone are wanted in life.” ~Thoma Grandgrind (p. 7).
Hold up, does this guy talking about facts remind you of
something? If it doesn’t let us give you a good feminist critique:
When he mentions facts it is almost like the STEM (Science,
technology, engeneering, mathematics)/Arts dichotomy. If this doesn’t ring a
bell think of how many research grants are given to the math and sciences
compared to WSU closing its Theater/Dance department 3 years ago. Currently,
much funding is being taken out of our schools from the music, theater, and
dance departments. This happens at the k-12 levels and even in higher
education. What could be the outcome of cutting the arts? There is a lot of
research that shows that the arts aid students in critical thinking. They are
also a good creative outlet.
Let’s take this critique to another level, is it
coincidental that STEM careers are ruled by men? The implications of the
STEM/Arts dichotomy extend to gender and race relations. As English majors we
understand how creative writing is critical to our field. We also make emphasis
on the importance of critical thinking. So the utilitarian elitist critique Dickens’
makes parallels to the issues that we find in our education system.
Another important factor of facts is that there are race
relations in them. Think of how little writers of color we study in our English
courses. People of color and their knowledge have not been recognized by many
academics. History books and even science have posed people of color as lesser
to white people. Back in the 18th and 19th century, there
were many taxonomists who did research on brain sizes and falsely accused
people of color to have smaller brains; thus, they posed people of color as
inferior to white people. History books also lack diversity in the people that
they study; an intersection to think about is queer people. LGBT (Lesbian, gay,
bisexual, and transgender) history is rarely found in history books.
Without critical thinking and creativity, which occurs in the
arts, we ignore the power relations that occur in facts. Facts are biased
through the heteronormative patriarchal AND white supremacist ideologies of our
country. Thus, the utilitarian education critique that Dickens’ makes acts as a
warning to readers. The arguments we make are grounded on feminist theory and
we hope that you open your mind to these ideas. We also hope that you begin to
think of how facts are presented in your college courses.
A thought-provoking post, Ruben. I am eager to see others' responses to it!
ReplyDeleteI am very glad that you bring this issue up. Thank you! As someone that believes in the importance of art in the classroom, I too, feel this is often overlooked. There is no innovation (in any field, including STEM) without creativity and the arts are conducive to this. Even in current elementary classrooms there is such a focus on STEM that they integrate it into the little art they do expose children to (my daughter has art class once a week!). There is no true freedom in creativity. Even more, I agree with your further critique about gender and race and I feel what you have brought up warrants more discussion. What do you think are some ways that we could implement change and remedy this problem?
ReplyDelete- Holly